This video argues that the most effective way to discipline teenagers is not through punishment or removing privileges, but by using natural consequences. This approach teaches teens to take responsibility for their actions by allowing them to experience the direct results of their choices without parental intervention.
Natural Consequences: The Primary Approach
Natural consequences are the unavoidable outcomes of an action. The parent’s role is to step back and let these consequences unfold without lecturing or bailing the teen out. The experience itself is the most effective teacher.
- Example 1: A son who is two hours late for dinner finds that no food was saved for him and must find his own solution for his hunger.
- Example 2: A daughter who overspends her allowance and cannot afford a concert ticket is not given an advance. She misses the concert.
It’s crucial for parents to resist the urge to lecture after the fact, as this can undermine the lesson the natural consequence has already taught.
When Natural Consequences Don’t Work
There are specific situations where you should intervene and not allow natural consequences to occur:
- When the teen or someone else would be in physical danger.
- When the consequence would inadvertently encourage the negative behavior (e.g., a teen who enjoys the negative attention from being disruptive in class).
In these cases, the video recommends using logical consequences instead.
Using Logical Consequences: The Three R’s
Logical consequences are parent-designed outcomes that are directly connected to the misbehavior. Unlike punishments, which are often unrelated and intended to shame, logical consequences are used respectfully to teach. They should follow the “Three R’s” framework:
- Respectful: The consequence is enforced calmly, respecting the teen’s dignity.
- Related: The consequence is directly linked to the negative behavior. (e.g., breaking curfew results in an earlier curfew).
- Reasonable: The severity of the consequence is proportional to the misbehavior.
The ultimate goal of both approaches is not to punish but to coach and guide teens toward making good decisions independently, fostering responsibility without creating resentment.
Mentoring question
Think about a recent time you stepped in to rescue your teen from a mistake. What might have been the long-term lesson if you had allowed the natural consequence to unfold instead?
Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=utOIhhS7Js0&si=5GViVZd7PkoXfGn3
Leave a Reply