The Central Theme: Breaking the Silence
The article explores the concept of “upward feedback”—employees providing feedback to their supervisors. Despite its potential to transform organizations, it remains a rare practice due to fears of consequences, lack of psychological safety, and cultural misconceptions. The text argues that upward feedback is not just an act of courage but a definitive test of an organization’s maturity and a crucial “mirror” for leaders to understand their impact.
Key Barriers and Misconceptions
Several factors prevent employees from speaking up:
- Fear of Retaliation: Employees worry about negative consequences or being perceived as disloyal or demanding.
- Misinterpretation of Praise: Even positive feedback is withheld because employees fear being labeled as sycophants or manipulative.
- Lack of Psychological Safety: As highlighted by Google’s Project Aristotle, without a safe environment, teams choose silence over improvement.
- Cultural Norms: In some organizations, critiquing a superior is viewed as inappropriate or disrespectful.
The Value of Feedback for Leaders
When implemented correctly, upward feedback offers significant benefits:
- The “Mirror” Effect: It helps managers see how their specific behaviors (e.g., micromanagement) are perceived by the team (e.g., as coldness or lack of trust).
- Enhanced Engagement: Employees feel their voice matters, which increases agency and motivation.
- Crisis Resilience: Organizations that listen in both directions learn faster and adapt better to challenges.
Best Practices for Implementation
Experts suggest that while leaders should ideally initiate the process to set an example, feedback can originate from any level. Effective delivery relies on specific guidelines:
- Preparation and Consent: Ask if the person is ready to receive feedback.
- Privacy and Timing: Conduct conversations one-on-one, never in public, and avoid times of high emotion.
- Focus on Facts: Discuss specific behaviors and facts rather than attacking the person’s character.
- Respectful Boundaries: The conversation must remain respectful. If it turns into a vent for frustration or aggression, boundaries have been crossed.
Handling Defensive Reactions
Not every manager is ready to accept feedback. If a leader reacts with defensiveness, anger, or dismissal (fight or flight response), it is best to pause the conversation. The article advises employees to respect their own safety and boundaries, noting that in toxic environments where trust is absent, it may be wiser to withhold feedback or use “feedforward”—focusing on future suggestions rather than past mistakes.
Mentoring question
If you were to ask your team today what one behavior of yours they would like you to change to help them succeed, are you prepared to listen to the answer without becoming defensive?
Leave a Reply