Self-Contained Systems: A Pragmatic Alternative to Monoliths and Microservices

Central Theme

The video addresses the ongoing, often flawed, debate between monolithic and microservices architectures. It argues that most development teams don’t work at the scale of Netflix and end up creating overly complex, distributed systems. The transcript introduces Self-Contained Systems (SCS) as a more pragmatic and effective middle-ground solution for the majority of business applications.

Key Points & Arguments

  • The Problem with Extremes: Traditional monoliths often become a “big ball of mud,” while microservices, intended as a solution, frequently lead to a “distributed hell” of unnecessary complexity, especially for projects that don’t require hyper-scalability.
  • Introducing Self-Contained Systems (SCS): SCS is an architectural style where an application is broken down into independent, vertical slices. Each system is a self-sufficient unit containing its own UI, backend logic, and dedicated database.
  • The Core Principle: The defining feature of SCS is the strict rule of having no runtime dependencies on other systems. This eliminates the need for complex patterns like circuit breakers and distributed tracing, as there are no direct, synchronous calls between systems.
  • Communication Strategy: When systems need to exchange data, they do so minimally and asynchronously. Communication happens either through simple links in the user interface or via decoupled, event-based messaging.
  • Benefits: This approach promotes true modularity and team autonomy. It avoids the common anti-pattern of a single monolithic frontend interacting with dozens of micro-APIs, leading to a system that is more maintainable and doesn’t collapse under its own complexity.

Conclusion & Takeaway

For massive, real-time platforms, microservices might be the right choice. However, for the vast majority of business applications, internal tools, and systems that do not require hyper-scale, Self-Contained Systems offer a cleaner and more practical architecture. SCS provides the benefits of modularity and team independence without the immense operational overhead and distributed complexity that microservices often introduce unnecessarily.

Mentoring Question

Considering your current or a past project, where could you have drawn clearer “vertical” boundaries to create more self-contained components, and what immediate benefits might that have provided for team autonomy and system maintainability?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XQMDqOmtm0g&si=Z1NfXN9-igzIcpBf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Posted

in

by

Tags: