Central Theme
The article challenges the notion of a fixed, mandatory reading list for “intelligent people.” It argues that the true value of reading lies not in checking off classic titles to prove one’s intellect, but in personal growth, developing critical thinking, and fostering empathy. The central question is: What kind of books genuinely enrich a person, and how should we approach the idea of a literary canon?
Key Points & Findings
- Critique of a Universal Canon: The author posits that no single list of books can define intelligence. The social pressure to have read certain works is often more about appearances than genuine understanding.
- Categorized Recommendations: The article suggests books based on the skills they cultivate:
- Classics You Should Know: This section includes titles like George Orwell’s 1984, Albert Camus’ The Plague, and Olga Tokarczuk’s Flights, which serve as cultural cornerstones and offer timeless insights into society and the human condition.
- Books That Teach Thinking: This category features works such as Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens, Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, and Susan Sontag’s On Photography. These books encourage readers to question assumptions, analyze complex systems, and think critically about the world.
- Books That Teach Empathy: Titles like Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and Antoine de Saint-Exupéry’s The Little Prince are recommended for their ability to build compassion and emotional understanding.
- The “Anti-List”: A bonus section mentions that some highly-praised books (e.g., James Joyce’s Ulysses) can be frustrating or pretentious for many, suggesting that readers shouldn’t feel obligated to finish books that don’t resonate with them.
Conclusions & Takeaways
The ultimate message is that true intelligence is characterized by curiosity and reflection, not by the number of canonical books read. The best reading list is a personal one, created from books that have genuinely moved, challenged, or changed the reader. Reading should be driven by personal interest and the pursuit of meaning, not by external pressure or obligation.
Mentoring Question for the Reader:
The article suggests that the most meaningful reading list is one you build for yourself. What book, whether a classic or not, has personally challenged your perspective or deeply moved you, and why do you consider it essential to your personal canon?
Leave a Reply